RABET-V
The Rapid Architecture-Based Election Technology Verification (RABET-VTM) program is a rapid, reliable, and cost-effective approach to verifying non-voting election systems.
RABET-V is designed to introduce testing standards by which election offices can better understand the security, reliability, and risks associated with the technology used for non-voting systems like electronic pollbooks and election night reporting systems.
Addressing the Verification Problem
There is no standard, national-level process for verifying that non-voting election technology is secure, reliable, accessible, and usable. This puts elections jurisdictions at risk, burdens vendors with extra costs, and risks inconsistent and insecure outcomes.
Offering a Trusted Solution
RABET-V is a flexible, rapid, and cost-effective process for verifying vendor-provided and homegrown non-voting election technology. RABET-V assesses a product and the organization responsible for developing it by scoring its development process, architecture, and the product's performance to form a more complete picture of non-voting election technology.
For more details, please see our technical documentation.
- Comprehensive view: Conducts a holistic assessment of the technology producer’s development processes, the product’s architectures, and the product's performance.
- Actionable results: Provides reports on the assessments that support continual improvement and more clarity in procurements.
- Scalability potential: Uses the results from previous assessments and information about product changes to scale the level of testing for future versions.
The Value of RABET-V
- Rigorous methodology: A thorough approach to testing non-voting equipment.
- Rapidly retest for risks: A risk-based way to rapidly retest products after changes.
- Practical assurance: A cost-effective solution for ensuring verified products, and the most up-to-date versions of those products, are deployed in election environments.
- No cost to election offices: Election offices can request reports directly from vendors as part of procurement and review processes.
- Efficient process: Lowers overall costs to vendors and election offices by removing redundancy across states and streamlining testing.
- Confidential scoring: Technology providers receive reports with scores and detailed recommendations for improvement, and can choose how and when to share this information.
